For years, I enjoyed taking photos with my trusty Minolta SLR (single lens reflex) camera. I may not have been the world's best photographer, but the quality of the camera combined with my reasonable eye for a good photo produced the goods.
Then the digital revolution arrived. I bought a digital compact camera and marvelled at the way images appeared instantly, without waiting for Boots or Bonus Print to produce prints. My Minolta gathered dust in the cupboard. I doubted whether I needed a big camera when a tiny one produced such wonderful photos.
And yet... Digital cameras seem to lose concentration at a crucial time. What you see isn't always what you get, especially when using flash. I dismissed this as a minor irritation for a while, then acknowledged this was a huge disadvantage. It was time to rediscover the SLR, 22 years after I bought my first, a Praktika, with money my parents gave me for passing my university final exams in 1985.
I chose a Canon, the EOS 400D, and expected to buy it during 2008. But my wife Karen had picked up a few hints I hadn't realised I'd dropped and presented a new camera to me on Christmas morning. What a wonderful surprise.
The results so far have delighted me. Instant results. No time lag. Great portraits. Here are a few examples: berries in a field on Boxing Day and our youngest niece Verity:
That said, the software that Canon provides with the 400D is dreadful. First, it's not designed for Windows Vista - despite the fact Microsoft's latest operating system is almost a year old. As a result, it didn't work on my new computer. I then took 100 minutes downloading the latest Canon EOS utilty software on a fast broadband connection. I needn't have bothered - the standard Vista software is far more user-friendly than Canon's program. It's a shame as the EOS and my Canon Pixma printer are excellent.
Recent Comments