A life and death drama: the stuff of every journalist's dreams. Unless, that is, the story is about your own newspaper. Reporters on the Observer, the world's oldest Sunday paper, this week had the unpleasant experience of reading about their title's possible closure in their arch rival, the Sunday Times.
The chief executive of Guardian Media Group, Carolyn McCall, confirmed the possibility in a memo to staff yesterday, according to The Times.
The marriage of the Guardian and Observer in 1993 seemed like a union of soulmates: two of Britain's only left-leaning newspapers coming together to offer seven day reading for those of us who couldn't stomach the staunchly Conservative Daily Telegraph or the Murdoch-owned Times. But it never quite worked out like that. The Guardian's Saturday edition grew into a terrific weekend read, which meant many readers didn't want more of the same the next day. The Scott Trust, the proprietor of the two titles, has never had the same commitment to the Sunday paper. And while the Guardian has had just two editors since 1975, the Observer has had five since the Guardian group bought it 16 years ago - hardly a recipe for stability.
Reports suggest that the Observer's owners are considering turning the world's oldest Sunday paper into a weekly news magazine. I don't believe this for a minute. News magazines in Britain have an almost universal record of commercial failure: millionaire James Goldsmith failed spectacularly with Now! magazine 30 years ago - long before the internet upset the print apple-cart. Only a delusional optimist could imagine a commercially unsuccessful British newspaper could flourish as a news magazine.
I'd be very sorry to see the Observer disappear. By a strange coincidence, I first got to know the paper 30 years ago when the then owners of the Sunday Times closed the paper (and the Times) for a whole year in a futile attempt to break the strangehold of the print unions. (As a result, Margaret Thatcher's triumph in the 1979 general election went completely unrecorded by either title.) I've long admired the consumer-championing personal finance pages, edited for many years by the late Joanna Slaughter and more recently Jill Insley and Lisa Bachelor. (With an honourable mention for Margaret Dibben, who sorts out readers' problems with banks and the like.) And earlier this year the section's deputy editor, Sam Dunn asked me to write a personal viewpoint in the paper about the decline of the humble cheque. It caused quite a stir - and I concede that many readers challenged my view that the cheque was doomed!
If you want to help save the Observer, buy it this Sunday. You can also join the Twitter and Facebook campaigns to help save it - but there's no point signing up unless you're going to buy the paper every week!
PS: during the 1970s closure of Times Newspapers, the Observer ran a cartoon mocking the Times's then advertising slogan, Have you wished you were better informed? The cartoon showed a road flyover being built in two halves - with the two sections reaching each other at different heights, one labelled 'Times management', the other 'print unions'. Three decades later, it's the older title that appears in need of enlightenment.
Recent Comments